Eisenberg v. McKee

272 S.W.3d 266, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1325, 2008 WL 4401411
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 30, 2008·No. ED 90612·Published

Opinion

*267 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Elizabeth Eisenberg (Eisenberg) appeals from the trial court’s Order and Judgment, which granted the Joint Motion for Summary Judgment, fried by Brad Goss and Barnet M. McKee, and found that the Agreement and Mutual Release signed by Eisenberg bars Eisenberg’s cause of action for legal malpractice against them. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eisenberg v. McKee, 272 S.W.3d 266, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1325, 2008 WL 4401411 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

272 S.W.3d 266 (Eisenberg v. McKee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.