Eisenberg v. Gold Flowers Design Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 16, 2022·No. 7:20-cv-02488-PED·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT eee x Dif 22 ELAINE EISENBERG, et al., Ee □□□

Plaintiffs, ORDER -against- 20 Civ. 2488 (PED) GOLD FLOWERS DESIGN, et al., Defendants. penne neem

On July 2, 2021, Judge Halpern entered a default judgment as to liability against defendant The Mansion at Lawrence, LLC (Dkt. #38) and referred this matter to me to conduct

an inquest concerning plaintiffs’ damages. (Dkt. #39), On July 16, 2021, 1 issued a Scheduling Order (Dkt. #40) directing plaintiff to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law by August 27, 2021 and directing defendant to submit any responsive materials by September 17, 2021, The Scheduling Order also stated that plaintiffs’ submission must contain a statement of the exact dollar amount(s) being sought and should demonstrate how plaintiffs arrived at the proposed figure(s). Dkt. #40, {ff 1-2. Plaintiffs timely filed Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Dkt. #42); to date, defendant has not filed any opposition or contacted the Court in any way. Preliminary review of plaintiffs’ submission reveals: (1) plaintiff Elaine Eisenberg seeks

an award of $175,000 for pain and suffering; and (2) plaintiff Douglas Eisenberg seeks an award of $7,500 on his spousal derivative claim for loss of services. Dkt. #42, (40. “The assessment of damages following entry of a default judgment in a diversity action is governed by state law standards.” Norcia v. Dieber’s Castle Tavern, Lid., 980 F. Supp.2d 492, 500 (S.D.N.¥. 2013)

(quotation marks and citation omitted), “Under New York law . . . courts look to approved awards in similar cases as guideposts in fashioning appropriate damage awards.” Jd. at 500-01 (quotation marks and citation omitted). Here, however, plaintiffs do not cite any case law to substantiate the amount of their requested damages. Accordingly, plaintiffs are directed to file a supplemental submission setting forth comparable approved awards from similar cases by March 9, 2022. Plaintiffs shall serve a copy of this Order on defendant The Mansion at Lawrence, LLC, and shall file an affidavit of service.

Dated: February 16, 2022 SO ORDERED. moe White Plains, New York fe \ ee a | a on eo emma meninae pecan Poni nneoenCini nm re PAUL Es DAVISON, U.S.M.F. □

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eisenberg v. Gold Flowers Design Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Eisenberg v. Gold Flowers Design Inc. (Eisenberg v. Gold Flowers Design Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Norcia v. Dieber's Castle Tavern, Ltd.
980 F. Supp. 2d 492 (S.D. New York, 2013)