Eisenberg v. Eisenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eisenberg v. Eisenberg

48 A.D.2d 775, 369 N.Y.S.2d 136, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9951

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.2d 775 (Eisenberg v. Eisenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eisenberg v. Eisenberg, 48 A.D.2d 775, 369 N.Y.S.2d 136, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 22, 1975, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to reinstate the second counterclaim, and otherwise affirmed; order of Gomez, J. entered on the same date awarding plaintiff temporary alimony, support and counsel fees unanimously affirmed. Plaintiff shall recover of defendant-appellant one bill of $60 costs and disbursements. In this divorce action by the plaintiff wife, wherein defendant husband counterclaimed for like relief, the answer alleged adultery in the first counterclaim, and, in the second counterclaim, cruel and inhuman treatment (Domestic Relations Law, § 170, subd [1]). The latter is sufficiently pleaded, Hessen v Hessen (33 NY2d 406), while the adultery claim was vague and incomplete (see Foster & Freed, Law and the Family, vol 1 [rev ed], § 5:36, p 164), and was properly dismissed with leave to replead. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Tilzer, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 22, 1975, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to reinstate the second counterclaim, and otherwise affirmed; order of Gomez, J. entered on the same date awarding plaintiff temporary alimony, support and counsel fees unanimously affirmed. Plaintiff shall recover of defendant-appellant one bill of $60 costs and disbursements. In this divorce action by the plaintiff wife, wherein defendant husband counterclaimed for like relief, the answer alleged adultery in the first counterclaim, and, in the second counterclaim, cruel and inhuman treatment (Domestic Relations Law, § 170, subd [1]). The latter is sufficiently pleaded, Hessen v Hessen (33 NY2d 406), while the adultery claim was vague and incomplete (see Foster & Freed, Law and the Family, vol 1 [rev ed], § 5:36, p 164), and was properly dismissed with leave to replead. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Tilzer, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 775, 369 N.Y.S.2d 136, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eisenberg-v-eisenberg-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack