Eisen v. Eisen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eisen v. Eisen

53 A.D.2d 601, 385 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13264

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 53 A.D.2d 601 (Eisen v. Eisen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eisen v. Eisen, 53 A.D.2d 601, 385 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13264 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for divorce, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 23, 1975, which granted defendant an additional counsel fee to defend an appeal and to prosecute a cross appeal. Order modified by reducing the amount of the additional counsel fee from $1,000 to $500. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The additional counsel fee is to be paid within 90 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. In view of all the facts and circumstances, including the amount of prior allowances, the additional counsel fee awarded was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for divorce, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 23, 1975, which granted defendant an additional counsel fee to defend an appeal and to prosecute a cross appeal. Order modified by reducing the amount of the additional counsel fee from $1,000 to $500. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The additional counsel fee is to be paid within 90 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. In view of all the facts and circumstances, including the amount of prior allowances, the additional counsel fee awarded was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 601, 385 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eisen-v-eisen-nyappdiv-1976.