Eisemann v. Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland
78 N.E.2d 613, 297 N.Y. 822, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 935
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs upon the ground that the action is barred by the two-year Statute of Limitations. We pass upon no other question. No opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thachbr, Dye and Fund, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eisemann v. Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland, 78 N.E.2d 613, 297 N.Y. 822, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 935 (N.Y. 1948).
78 N.E.2d 613 (Eisemann v. Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Frank Made Sportswear, Inc. v. Charles W. Carvin Co.
17 Misc. 2d 874 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Eisemann v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
194 Misc. 664 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)