Eiselle v. State
556 So. 2d 835, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 997, 1990 WL 14258
This text of 556 So. 2d 835 (Eiselle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Eiselle v. State, 556 So. 2d 835, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 997, 1990 WL 14258 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
We affirm the final judgment, but reverse the sentence imposed and remand so that the trial court may strike the provision for costs, imposed without notice, or conduct a hearing to impose costs. See Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Mays v. State
519 So. 2d 618 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
556 So. 2d 835, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 997, 1990 WL 14258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eiselle-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.