Einziger Bros. v. Marino

240 A.D. 727

This text of 240 A.D. 727 (Einziger Bros. v. Marino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Einziger Bros. v. Marino, 240 A.D. 727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Order granting motion for summary judgment reversed on the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. The affidavits disclose (somewhat obscurely) a question of fact as to the status of Kimmerer in his relation to the parties, which in turn may have a bearing upon the knowledge or benefit, actual or presumptive, of the corporation with respect to the alleged bonus, etc. (New York Mortgage Co. v. Garfinkle, 231 App. Div. 327, 329.) The matter should be disposed of on a trial. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York Mortgage Co. v. Garfinkle
231 A.D. 327 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/einziger-bros-v-marino-nyappdiv-1933.