Einstein v. Climax Cycle Co.
This text of 13 A.D. 624 (Einstein v. Climax Cycle Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a motion made by a junior attaching creditor to set aside an attachment procured by the plaintiff. The ground upon which the attachment was vacated was the insufficiency of the affidavit upon which it was granted. That affidavit was made by the assignee of the claim sued upon, and he asserted the facts constituting the cause of action to be within his own knowledge, but did not disclose his means of knowledge nor give any information as t-o how that alleged' knowledge was obtained. The case, therefore, comes within the ruling made in Hoormann v. Climax Cycle Co. (9 App. Div. 579), and the order should be affirmed, with costs. Present — Van Brunt, P. J., Barrett, Rumsey, Williams and Patterson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 A.D. 624, 42 N.Y.S. 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/einstein-v-climax-cycle-co-nyappdiv-1897.