Eilert v. Gordon
This text of 121 N.Y.S. 604 (Eilert v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff is the publisher of the Luther League Review. Defendant advertised therein. The contract was in the form of written authority, on a printed blank addressed to “the publishers of the Luther League Review,” accepted by printing the advertisement. The Review is owned by the "Luther League, an unincorporated re[605]*605ligious association said to have 80,000 members. We think that plaintiff was authorized to sue under Code Civ. Proc. § 449; Considerant v. Brisbane, 22 N. Y. 389, 395; Albany & Rensselaer Co. v. Lundberg, 121 U. S. 451, 453, 7 Sup. Ct. 958, 30 L. Ed. 982.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 N.Y.S. 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eilert-v-gordon-nyappterm-1910.