Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Eilenberg v. Elaz

Eilenberg v. Elaz

156 A.D.2d 929
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 20, 1989
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 156 A.D.2d 929 (Eilenberg v. Elaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eilenberg v. Elaz, 156 A.D.2d 929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court’s determination denying the mother’s application to relocate from Buffalo to Brooklyn and conditionally awarding custody of the children to the father is supported by the record (see, Matter of Louise E. S. v W. Stephen S,, 64 NY2d 946, 947; Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 173). Absent exceptional or compelling circumstances, a geographic relocation by a custodial parent will not be permitted (see, Weiss v Weiss, 52 NY2d 170). On this record the mother has failed to establish that the needs of the children, particularly those involving religious concerns, or the professional interests of her new husband constitute such circumstance requiring relocation (see, Richardson v Howard, 135 AD2d 1140; Matter of Kelly v Kelly, 132 AD2d 977; Barie v Faulkner, 115 AD2d 1003; Daghir v Daghir, 82 AD2d 191, 196, affd 56 NY2d 938; cf, Matter of Pecorello v Snodgrass, 142 AD2d 920, appeal dismissed 72 NY2d 1039). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Roberts, J. — custody.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weiss v. Weiss
418 N.E.2d 377 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Eschbach v. Eschbach
436 N.E.2d 1260 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Daghir v. Daghir
439 N.E.2d 324 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Louise E. S. v. W. Stephen S.
477 N.E.2d 1091 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Daghir v. Daghir
82 A.D.2d 191 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Barie v. Faulkner
115 A.D.2d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Kelly v. Kelly
132 A.D.2d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Richardson v. Howard
135 A.D.2d 1140 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Pecorello v. Snodgrass
142 A.D.2d 920 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 A.D.2d 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eilenberg-v-elaz-nyappdiv-1989.