Eiland v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Eiland v. State

863 S.W.2d 20, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1608, 1993 WL 410660

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 1993·No. No. 63821·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The [21]*21findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The [21]*21findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Eiland v. State, 863 S.W.2d 20, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1608, 1993 WL 410660 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

863 S.W.2d 20 (Eiland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.