Eikevik v. Kakati
This text of 57 A.D.2d 914 (Eikevik v. Kakati) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and personal injuries predicated upon medical malpractice, defendant Eric Entin appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 17, 1977, which denied his motion to preclude plaintiff from offering of any evidence of particulars which had been demanded, or, in the alternative, for a further bill of particulars. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Special Term properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion for an order of preclusion or for a further bill of particulars. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 A.D.2d 914, 394 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eikevik-v-kakati-nyappdiv-1977.