Eighty William St. Bldg. Co. v. Jones

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Eighty William St. Bldg. Co. v. Jones

101 N.Y.S. 757

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 101 N.Y.S. 757 (Eighty William St. Bldg. Co. v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eighty William St. Bldg. Co. v. Jones, 101 N.Y.S. 757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The amendment of the Municipal Court act relied on to support the action of the justice relates to amendments in the interest of justice other, of course, than jurisdictional. The point raised here is that the process in the first instance did not bring the tenant properly within the jurisdiction, and the amendment allowed was error. Ferber v. Apfel (Sup.) 99 N. Y. Supp. 215.

Final order reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The amendment of the Municipal Court act relied on to support the action of the justice relates to amendments in the interest of justice other, of course, than jurisdictional. The point raised here is that the process in the first instance did not bring the tenant properly within the jurisdiction, and the amendment allowed was error. Ferber v. Apfel (Sup.) 99 N. Y. Supp. 215.

Final order reversed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 N.Y.S. 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eighty-william-st-bldg-co-v-jones-nyappterm-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack