Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation v. Asbestospray Corp.

255 A.D.2d 1002, 679 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12304
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1998·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover for personal injuries and wrongful death resulting from the exposure of plaintiffs decedent to asbestos-containing products manufactured and distributed by the pre[1003] decessor of Master Builders, Inc. (defendant). Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. Defendant failed in the first instance to establish that its product could not have contributed to the causation of the injury and death of plaintiffs decedent (see, Reid v Georgia-Pacific Corp., 212 AD2d 462, 463; cf., Comeau v Grace & Co., 216 AD2d 79, 80). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kane, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Pigott, Jr., Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation v. Asbestospray Corp., 255 A.D.2d 1002, 679 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12304 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

255 A.D.2d 1002 (Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation v. Asbestospray Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Refermat v. A.C. & S., Inc.
15 A.D.3d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Shuman v. Abex Corp.
266 A.D.2d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)