Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation v. Asbestospray Corp.
This text of 255 A.D.2d 1002 (Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation v. Asbestospray Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover for personal injuries and wrongful death resulting from the exposure of plaintiffs decedent to asbestos-containing products manufactured and distributed by the pre[1003]*1003decessor of Master Builders, Inc. (defendant). Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. Defendant failed in the first instance to establish that its product could not have contributed to the causation of the injury and death of plaintiffs decedent (see, Reid v Georgia-Pacific Corp., 212 AD2d 462, 463; cf., Comeau v Grace & Co., 216 AD2d 79, 80). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kane, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Pigott, Jr., Balio and Fallon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D.2d 1002, 679 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eighth-judicial-district-asbestos-litigation-v-asbestospray-corp-nyappdiv-1998.