Eidem v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
731 A.2d 128
This text of 731 A.2d 128 (Eidem v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Eidem v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 731 A.2d 128 (Pa. 1999).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 9- day of June, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the parties are directed to brief the issue as follows:
Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in finding that the referral letter did not provide sufficient notice of a job position, where employee had previously been employed in that position, in order to satisfy employer’s burden of proof pursuant to Kachinski v. W.C.A.B. (Vepco Construction Co.), 516 Pa. 240, 532 A.2d 374 (1987).
The Petition for Supersedeas is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
532 A.2d 374 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
731 A.2d 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eidem-v-workers-compensation-appeal-board-pa-1999.