Eide v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 070843b (or.tax 5-2-2008)

Oregon Tax Court

Eide v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 070843b (or.tax 5-2-2008)

Oregon Tax Court·Decided May 2, 2008·No. TC-MD 070843B.·Published

Opinion

DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on Defendant's motion to dismiss (motion), filed December 10, 2007, as part of its Answer, requesting that the Complaint be dismissed.

A case management conference was held on February 5, 2008, to discuss Defendant's motion. Dyana S. Eide appeared on her own behalf. Linnea Wittekind, tax auditor, appeared for Defendant.

Defendant contends that Plaintiff filed her appeal 112 days after the date of the Notice of Deficiency Assessment (Notice), dated August 9, 2007. Plaintiff stated she was unaware of the filing deadline. During the conference, Plaintiff acknowledged that she postmarked her Complaint to the court November 29, 2007, which is more than 90 days after the date the Defendant's Notice became final. See ORS 305.280(2) (2005);McDowell v. Dept. of Rev., TC-MD No 050812C (Nov 28, 2005) (citing ORS305.280(2) and holding that taxpayer's appeal filed three days after the statutory deadline must be dismissed). *Page 2

Because Plaintiff acknowledges that the Complaint was filed after the statutory deadline, the court grants Defendant's motion. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed.

Dated this ___ day of May 2008.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Magistrate Jefffrey S. Mattson on May 2,2008. The Court filed and entered this document on May 2, 2008. *Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on Defendant's motion to dismiss (motion), filed December 10, 2007, as part of its Answer, requesting that the Complaint be dismissed.

A case management conference was held on February 5, 2008, to discuss Defendant's motion. Dyana S. Eide appeared on her own behalf. Linnea Wittekind, tax auditor, appeared for Defendant.

Defendant contends that Plaintiff filed her appeal 112 days after the date of the Notice of Deficiency Assessment (Notice), dated August 9, 2007. Plaintiff stated she was unaware of the filing deadline. During the conference, Plaintiff acknowledged that she postmarked her Complaint to the court November 29, 2007, which is more than 90 days after the date the Defendant's Notice became final. See ORS 305.280(2) (2005);McDowell v. Dept. of Rev., TC-MD No 050812C (Nov 28, 2005) (citing ORS305.280(2) and holding that taxpayer's appeal filed three days after the statutory deadline must be dismissed). *Page 2

Because Plaintiff acknowledges that the Complaint was filed after the statutory deadline, the court grants Defendant's motion. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed.

Dated this ___ day of May 2008.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Magistrate Jefffrey S. Mattson on May 2,2008. The Court filed and entered this document on May 2, 2008. *Page 1

Eide v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 070843b (or.tax 5-2-2008), (Or. Super. Ct. 2008).

Pincite

Eide v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 070843b (or.tax 5-2-2008) (Eide v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 070843b (or.tax 5-2-2008)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related