Eichholz v. . Polack

102 N.E. 1102, 208 N.Y. 637, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 1261
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 3, 1913
StatusPublished

This text of 102 N.E. 1102 (Eichholz v. . Polack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eichholz v. . Polack, 102 N.E. 1102, 208 N.Y. 637, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 1261 (N.Y. 1913).

Opinion

Judgment of the Appellate Division so far as it modified the judgment of the Special Term reversed, and the judgment of the Special Term in all things affirmed, with costs to plaintiff in both courts; no opinion.

■ Concur; Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Chase, Cuddeback and Hogan, JJ. Not voting: Willard Bartlett, J. Not sitting: Miller, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 N.E. 1102, 208 N.Y. 637, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 1261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eichholz-v-polack-ny-1913.