Eichholz v. LaRoche

100 S.E. 722, 24 Ga. App. 281, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 567
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 14, 1919·No. 10697·Published

Opinion

Ltjke, J.

The judgment, although authorized, was not demanded by the evidence. Therefore the sustaining of the certiorari, upon the assignment of error that the judgment was without evidence to support it, will not be disturbed, for the reason that the judgment sustaining the certiorari for the first time was in the nature of a first grant of a new trial. See Parker v. Bridges, 22 Ga. App. 58 (95 S. E. 321), and cases there cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eichholz v. LaRoche, 100 S.E. 722, 24 Ga. App. 281, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 567 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

100 S.E. 722 (Eichholz v. LaRoche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parker v. Bridges
95 S.E. 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)