Eichert v. Eichert

Hamilton Circuit Court

Eichert v. Eichert

20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 810

DecidedJanuary 21, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 810 (Eichert v. Eichert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eichert v. Eichert, 20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 810 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from related to the distribution of the fund in n,n equity case, and was a final order in a civil action in which the parties affected thereby had not the right to demand a trial by a jury. Spence v. Basey, 34 Ohio St. 42.

The original action was commenced June 26, 1897; the order complained of was made March 31, 1904, to which was appended notice o£ appeal. The notice was therefore properly given in the mode prescribed by the statute in force at the commencement of the original action. Charles v. Fawley, 71 Ohio St. 50 [72 N. E. Rep. 294].

Motion to dismiss appeal overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from related to the distribution of the fund in n,n equity case, and was a final order in a civil action in which the parties affected thereby had not the right to demand a trial by a jury. Spence v. Basey, 34 Ohio St. 42.

The original action was commenced June 26, 1897; the order complained of was made March 31, 1904, to which was appended notice o£ appeal. The notice was therefore properly given in the mode prescribed by the statute in force at the commencement of the original action. Charles v. Fawley, 71 Ohio St. 50 [72 N. E. Rep. 294].

Motion to dismiss appeal overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eichert-v-eichert-ohcircthamilton-1905.