Eichen v. George B. Jr. Realty Inc.
This text of 154 A.D.2d 428 (Eichen v. George B. Jr. Realty Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated April 28, 1988, which granted the motion of Junction Properties, Inc., to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale entered March 13, 1987, and the ensuing sale.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in vacating the judgment of foreclosure and sale and the ensuing sale (CPLR 5015 [a] [1], [3]; Perellie v Crimson’s Rest., 108 AD2d 903; Shaw v Shaw, 97 AD2d 403). A liberal policy has been adopted with respect to opening default judgments in furtherance of justice to permit a trial on the merits wherever possible (DFI Communications v Golden Penn Theatre Ticket Serv., 87 AD2d 778; Cappel v RKO Stanley Warner Theaters, 61 AD2d 936). In light of the respondent’s meritorious defense and the parties’ apparent misunderstanding concerning the priority of their liens, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in vacating the judgment and ensuing [429]*429sale (see, Passalacqua v Banat, 103 AD2d 769). Lawrence, J. P., Rubin, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 A.D.2d 428, 547 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eichen-v-george-b-jr-realty-inc-nyappdiv-1989.