Eichelberger v. Nicholson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Eichelberger v. Nicholson

1 Serg. & Rawle 430

DecidedMay 16, 1815

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Serg. & Rawle 430 (Eichelberger v. Nicholson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eichelberger v. Nicholson, 1 Serg. & Rawle 430 (Pa. 1815).

Pincite

Opinion

.The Court

having intimated the strong inclination of their mind, that the writ of error did not lie, because final judgment had not been given, Mr. Duncan requested time to search for precedents. In the afternoon, Mr. Duncan admitted the law to be, that a writ of error did not lie until final judgment, or an order in the nature of final judgment. Whereupon the court ordered the writ of error to be quashed.

Writ of error quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

.The Court

having intimated the strong inclination of their mind, that the writ of error did not lie, because final judgment had not been given, Mr. Duncan requested time to search for precedents. In the afternoon, Mr. Duncan admitted the law to be, that a writ of error did not lie until final judgment, or an order in the nature of final judgment. Whereupon the court ordered the writ of error to be quashed.

Writ of error quashed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Serg. & Rawle 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eichelberger-v-nicholson-pa-1815.