Eichel v. MacDonald

506 F. App'x 215
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 23, 2013·No. No. 12-7997·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Albert Charles Eichel appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Eichel’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Eichel has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we deny Eichel’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eichel v. MacDonald, 506 F. App'x 215 (4th Cir. 2013).

506 F. App'x 215 (Eichel v. MacDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)