Eichberg v. Bandman

74 Ga. 834, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 431
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 30, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 Ga. 834 (Eichberg v. Bandman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eichberg v. Bandman, 74 Ga. 834, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 431 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

•Blandeord, Justice.

[Mrs. Caroline Eichberg brought suit against J. C. Band-man on an open account for board furnished. The testimony of the plaintiff was to the effect that she was a married woman, living with her husband, and had never been made a free-trader; that she had a separate estate, including the residence where the family resided: She took defendant to board with her, with the consent of her husband that she might do so and have the proceeds of his board. On motion, the court granted a non-suit, on the ground that the earnings of a married woman, who was not a free-trader, belonged to her husband, and she could .not sue for and collect them. Plaintiff excepted.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Tice
52 S.E. 916 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 Ga. 834, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eichberg-v-bandman-ga-1885.