Eichberg v. Bandman

74 Ga. 834, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 431
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 30, 1885·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

•Blandeord, Justice.

[Mrs. Caroline Eichberg brought suit against J. C. Band-man on an open account for board furnished. The testimony of the plaintiff was to the effect that she was a married woman, living with her husband, and had never been made a free-trader; that she had a separate estate, including the residence where the family resided: She took defendant to board with her, with the consent of her husband that she might do so and have the proceeds of his board. On motion, the court granted a non-suit, on the ground that the earnings of a married woman, who was not a free-trader, belonged to her husband, and she could .not sue for and collect them. Plaintiff excepted.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eichberg v. Bandman, 74 Ga. 834, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 431 (Ga. 1885).

74 Ga. 834 (Eichberg v. Bandman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Tice
52 S.E. 916 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)