Eichacker v. Eichacker

Missouri Court of Appeals

Eichacker v. Eichacker

505 S.W.3d 849, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1300, 2016 WL 7385569

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103752

StatusPublished

This text of 505 S.W.3d 849 (Eichacker v. Eichacker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eichacker v. Eichacker, 505 S.W.3d 849, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1300, 2016 WL 7385569 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jody Eichacker (‘Wife”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving her marriage to Richard Eichacker (“Husband”). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jody Eichacker (‘Wife”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving her marriage to Richard Eichacker (“Husband”). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

505 S.W.3d 849, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1300, 2016 WL 7385569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eichacker-v-eichacker-moctapp-2016.