Eibel v. Von Fell
48 A. 1117, 64 N.J.L. 364, 35 Vroom 364, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 126
This text of 48 A. 1117 (Eibel v. Von Fell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Eibel v. Von Fell, 48 A. 1117, 64 N.J.L. 364, 35 Vroom 364, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 126 (N.J. 1900).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in that court.
For affirmance—Depue, Van Syckel, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh. 10.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McDonald v. McNeil
104 A. 337 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1918)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
48 A. 1117, 64 N.J.L. 364, 35 Vroom 364, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eibel-v-von-fell-nj-1900.