Eibel v. Von Fell
48 A. 1117, 64 N.J.L. 364, 35 Vroom 364, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 126
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in that court.
For affirmance—Depue, Van Syckel, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh. 10.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eibel v. Von Fell, 48 A. 1117, 64 N.J.L. 364, 35 Vroom 364, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 126 (N.J. 1900).
48 A. 1117 (Eibel v. Von Fell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McDonald v. McNeil
104 A. 337 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1918)