E.I. Dupont v. Sidran
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed July 9, 2014 ________________
No. 3D12-321 Lower Tribunal No. 92-18377 ________________
E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Company, Inc., Appellant,
vs.
Claire J. Sidran, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Amy Steele Donner, Judge.
Boies, Schiller & Flexner, Stephen N. Zack and Andrew Brenner; Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein and Gary Magnarini; Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Edward A. Moss, Humberto H. Ocariz, and Thomas M. Sherouse, for appellant.
Arnold R. Ginsberg; Ratiner & Mirabal and Robert Ratiner, for appellees.
Before WELLS, SUAREZ, and SCALES, JJ.
On Motion for Rehearing and Clarification
WELLS, Judge. On consideration of the Sidrans’ motion for rehearing and clarification and
DuPont’s response, we grant the Sidrans’ motion, in part. This Court’s opinion
filed April 23, 2014 is corrected solely as to the penultimate sentence of that
opinion which should read:
The order on appeal is therefore reversed and the cause remanded for an
expedited trial on the merits of the Sidrans’ liability claims and DuPont’s defenses
thereto, with no further amendments.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E.I. Dupont v. Sidran (E.I. Dupont v. Sidran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.