E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. 1997 & 1998 Claims of Ecuadorian Shrimp Farmers

District Court of Appeal of Florida

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. 1997 & 1998 Claims of Ecuadorian Shrimp Farmers

860 So. 2d 529, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18767, 2003 WL 22902483

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 10, 2003·No. No. 4D03-3048·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

We deny petitioner’s motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc but issue the following revised opinion in lieu of our slip opinion issued on October 8, 2003:

Although we find the affidavit in support of prohibition signed by petitioner’s in-house counsel, Ms. Kittredge, meets the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.160(c) in this case¹, we deny the petition as the motion for disqualification was legally insufficient.

GUNTHER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

We deny petitioner’s motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc but issue the following revised opinion in lieu of our slip opinion issued on October 8, 2003:

Although we find the affidavit in support of prohibition signed by petitioner’s in-house counsel, Ms. Kittredge, meets the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.160(c) in this case¹, we deny the petition as the motion for disqualification was legally insufficient.

GUNTHER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. 1997 & 1998 Claims of Ecuadorian Shrimp Farmers, 860 So. 2d 529, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18767, 2003 WL 22902483 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

860 So. 2d 529 (E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. 1997 & 1998 Claims of Ecuadorian Shrimp Farmers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related