E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. 1997 & 1998 Claims of Ecuadorian Shrimp Farmers

860 So. 2d 529, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18767, 2003 WL 22902483
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 10, 2003
DocketNo. 4D03-3048
StatusPublished

This text of 860 So. 2d 529 (E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. 1997 & 1998 Claims of Ecuadorian Shrimp Farmers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. 1997 & 1998 Claims of Ecuadorian Shrimp Farmers, 860 So. 2d 529, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18767, 2003 WL 22902483 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

We deny petitioner’s motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc but issue the following revised opinion in lieu of our slip opinion issued on October 8, 2003:

Although we find the affidavit in support of prohibition signed by petitioner’s in-house counsel, Ms. Kittredge, meets the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.160(c) in this case1, we deny the petition as the motion for disqualification was legally insufficient.

GUNTHER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Parsons
644 So. 2d 340 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
860 So. 2d 529, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18767, 2003 WL 22902483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ei-du-pont-de-nemours-co-v-1997-1998-claims-of-ecuadorian-shrimp-fladistctapp-2003.