Ei Corporation, Inc. v. Gallant Capital Partners, LLC
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA EI CORPORATION, INC., Case No.: 2:20-cv-01119-APG-NJK 4 Plaintiff Order Denying Motion for Leave to File Partially Redacted Documents v. [ECF No. 31] GALLANT CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC; QUALITY BUILT, LLC; and JOHN GILLETT, 8 Defendants 9 Plaintiff Ei Corporation moves for leave to file redacted versions of its reply and exhibits 10}| attached to the reply. ECF No. 31. The plaintiff has not complied with Local Rule IA 10-5 for 11}|the proper means to file materials under seal. Particularly, the plaintiff’s motion gives me no way to evaluate whether the information should be redacted under Kamakana v. City and County 13} of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). 14 I THEREFORE ORDER that plaintiff Ei Corporation’s motion for leave to file redacted documents (ECF No. 31) is DENIED without prejudice to the plaintiff filing a properly supported motion to seal. 17 DATED this 10th day of July, 2020. 18 ( So. ANDREW P. GORDON 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ei Corporation, Inc. v. Gallant Capital Partners, LLC (Ei Corporation, Inc. v. Gallant Capital Partners, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.