Ehrlich v. Park Place Owners Ass'n

764 So. 2d 1, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5959, 1998 WL 264067
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 27, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2397
StatusPublished

This text of 764 So. 2d 1 (Ehrlich v. Park Place Owners Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ehrlich v. Park Place Owners Ass'n, 764 So. 2d 1, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5959, 1998 WL 264067 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in directing a verdict at the close of appellant’s case. There was an issue of fact as to whether appellee violated a duty of reasonable care in maintaining the premises. See Lotto v. Point East Two Condominium Corp. Inc., 702 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1997).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lotto v. Point East Two Condominium Corp.
702 So. 2d 1361 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 So. 2d 1, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5959, 1998 WL 264067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ehrlich-v-park-place-owners-assn-fladistctapp-1998.