Ehrlich v. Park Place Owners Ass'n
764 So. 2d 1, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5959, 1998 WL 264067
Opinion
The trial court erred in directing a verdict at the close of appellant’s case. There was an issue of fact as to whether appellee violated a duty of reasonable care in maintaining the premises. See Lotto v. Point East Two Condominium Corp. Inc., 702 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1997).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ehrlich v. Park Place Owners Ass'n, 764 So. 2d 1, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5959, 1998 WL 264067 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
764 So. 2d 1 (Ehrlich v. Park Place Owners Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lotto v. Point East Two Condominium Corp.
702 So. 2d 1361 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)