Ehrlich v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ehrlich v. Jones

113 S.E. 45, 29 Ga. App. 13, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 14

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 24, 1922

Docket13136

StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.E. 45 (Ehrlich v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ehrlich v. Jones, 113 S.E. 45, 29 Ga. App. 13, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 14 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

1. It cannot be said that the jury were altogether unauthorized to find from the evidence, as adduced on this, the second, trial, that one of the bales of cotton levied on was raised by the defendant in fi. fa. on the premises of his landlord, the plaintiff. See Ehrlich v. Jones, 26 Ga. App. 101 (2) (105 S. E. 495).

2. The charge of the court made it perfectly clear and plain that the cotton must have been raised by the defendant in fi. fa. on premises rented from the plaintiff'. The instruction relative to the alleged payment of the rent by the defendant in fi. fa. was sufficiently explicit to meet the evidence as actually offered.

Judgment affirmed.

Stejihens, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI