Ehrlich v. German Savings Bank & Clearing Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ehrlich v. German Savings Bank & Clearing Ass'n

284 A.D. 964, 135 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4253

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 1, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D. 964 (Ehrlich v. German Savings Bank & Clearing Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ehrlich v. German Savings Bank & Clearing Ass'n, 284 A.D. 964, 135 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4253 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Appellants, holders of defaulted bonds of the respondent, a German corporation, seek to recover thereon in this action against the latter and the defendant, the foreign corporation guarantor of payment thereof. The summons and complaint were served on the Corporation Trust Company, designated in the indentures under which the bonds were issued, as respondent’s agent to accept service of process. Respondent moved to vacate said service on the ground that the authority to accept service was limited to actions by the indenture trustees only. The appeal is from so much of the order as granted the motion in favor of respondent. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Murphy, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1043.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellants, holders of defaulted bonds of the respondent, a German corporation, seek to recover thereon in this action against the latter and the defendant, the foreign corporation guarantor of payment thereof. The summons and complaint were served on the Corporation Trust Company, designated in the indentures under which the bonds were issued, as respondent’s agent to accept service of process. Respondent moved to vacate said service on the ground that the authority to accept service was limited to actions by the indenture trustees only. The appeal is from so much of the order as granted the motion in favor of respondent. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Murphy, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1043.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D. 964, 135 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ehrlich-v-german-savings-bank-clearing-assn-nyappdiv-1954.