Ehrlich v. Bard
This text of 86 A.D.2d 650 (Ehrlich v. Bard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, for an accounting, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Balletta, J.), entered October 22,1980, which is in favor of defendants, upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of the plaintiffs’ case, at a nonjury trial. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. When plaintiff Francine Bard’s conversations with her father are excluded in accordance with CPLR 4519 and the hearsay rule, the proof fails to reach the level of a prima facie case. Lazer, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Bracken, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 A.D.2d 650, 447 N.Y.S.2d 421, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ehrlich-v-bard-nyappdiv-1982.