Ehrlich v. Allen

10 So. 3d 1210, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8764, 2009 WL 1872473
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 1, 2009
Docket4D08-1715, 4D08-2228
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 10 So. 3d 1210 (Ehrlich v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ehrlich v. Allen, 10 So. 3d 1210, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8764, 2009 WL 1872473 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

FARMER, J.

As we did in Ehrlich v. Severson, 985 So.2d 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), with regard to fees of the examining committee, we reverse the award of fees to the attorney for the alleged ward. In this case involving the same involuntary petition to determine competency in which the subject was not found incompetent, any award of fees incurred by counsel appointed to represent the subject must come, if at all, from the petitioner. See § 744.331(7)(c), Fla. Stat. (2007) (“If the petition is dismissed, costs and attorney’s fees of the proceeding may be assessed against the petitioner if the court finds the petition to have been filed in bad faith”).

Reversed.

POLEN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steiner v. Guardianship of Steiner
159 So. 3d 253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Yazdzik v. Scott
129 So. 3d 482 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Faulkner v. Faulkner
65 So. 3d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 So. 3d 1210, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8764, 2009 WL 1872473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ehrlich-v-allen-fladistctapp-2009.