Ehrlich & Brother v. Shuptrine

45 S.E. 279, 117 Ga. 882, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 377
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 29, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 45 S.E. 279 (Ehrlich & Brother v. Shuptrine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ehrlich & Brother v. Shuptrine, 45 S.E. 279, 117 Ga. 882, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 377 (Ga. 1903).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Asa city court lias no jurisdiction to grant affirmative equitable’ relief, it can not entertain a proceeding to set aside an assignment. If the assignment is void on its face, it is unnecessary to resort to any proceeding, legal or equitable, to have it so declared; if for other reasons it should beset aside, the proceeding therefor should be brought in a court having equitable jurisdiction. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Petition to vacate assignment. Before Judge Bower. City court of Bainbridge. September 4, 1902. Townsend &■ Westmoreland, for plaintiffs. A. H. & B. B. Bussell and B. W. Fleming, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gillespie v. SAND-ROCK TRANSIT, INC.
665 S.E.2d 385 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Sullivan v. Ginsberg
181 S.E. 163 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 S.E. 279, 117 Ga. 882, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ehrlich-brother-v-shuptrine-ga-1903.