Ehrlich & Brother v. Shuptrine
This text of 45 S.E. 279 (Ehrlich & Brother v. Shuptrine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Asa city court lias no jurisdiction to grant affirmative equitable’ relief, it can not entertain a proceeding to set aside an assignment. If the assignment is void on its face, it is unnecessary to resort to any proceeding, legal or equitable, to have it so declared; if for other reasons it should beset aside, the proceeding therefor should be brought in a court having equitable jurisdiction. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 S.E. 279, 117 Ga. 882, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ehrlich-brother-v-shuptrine-ga-1903.