Ehrhardt v. Karcinsky
This text of 11 A.D.2d 717 (Ehrhardt v. Karcinsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover for personal injuries and property damage, defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 19, 1959 denying his motion to vacate and set aside the default in appearing and answering the complaint, and to vacate the judgment entered thereon upon inquest; and (2) an order of the same court entered May 13, 1959, granting defendant’s motion for reconsideration and adhering to the original decision. Order entered May 13, 1959, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order entered March 19, 1959, dismissed. This order was superseded by the subsequent order. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 A.D.2d 717, 205 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ehrhardt-v-karcinsky-nyappdiv-1960.