Ehrgott v. Forgotston
17 N.Y.S. 381, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 318
The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo·Decided January 11, 1892·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The order appealed from is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, upon the opinion of the court below, excepting only the state-[383] merit, “Nor can the defendant foreclose it, as the mortgage was under seal, and not made to him;” andas to the correctness of this proposition no opinion is expressed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ehrgott v. Forgotston, 17 N.Y.S. 381, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 318 (superctny 1892).
17 N.Y.S. 381 (Ehrgott v. Forgotston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clover v. Silverman
58 N.Y. St. Rep. 137 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1893)
Clover v. Silverman
26 N.Y.S. 779 (Superior Court of New York, 1893)