Ehrgott v. Forgotston

43 N.Y. St. Rep. 60
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided January 11, 1892·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the opinion of the court ■below, excepting only the statement “Nor can the defendant foreclose it, as the mortgage was under seal and not made' to him,’! and as to the correctness of this proposition no opinion is expressed.

Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ehrgott v. Forgotston, 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 60 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

43 N.Y. St. Rep. 60 (Ehrgott v. Forgotston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.