Ehret v. . George Ringler Company

New York Court of Appeals

Ehret v. . George Ringler Company

98 N.E. 1102, 204 N.Y. 638, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 871

New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 2, 1912·Published

Opinion

*639 Appeal dismissed, without costs to either party, and without prejudice to a renewal of the application to the Supreme Court, the situation having so changed since the decision of the Appellate Division that the question certified is no longer controlling on the rights of the parties, and this court is confined to a decision of the question certified; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*639 Appeal dismissed, without costs to either party, and without prejudice to a renewal of the application to the Supreme Court, the situation having so changed since the decision of the Appellate Division that the question certified is no longer controlling on the rights of the parties, and this court is confined to a decision of the question certified; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.

Ehret v. . George Ringler Company, 98 N.E. 1102, 204 N.Y. 638, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 871 (N.Y. 1912).

Pincite

98 N.E. 1102 (Ehret v. . George Ringler Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.