Ehret Magnesia Mfg. Co. v. Lungwitz

237 F. 1017, 150 C.C.A. 665
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJanuary 10, 1917
DocketNo. 2128
StatusPublished

This text of 237 F. 1017 (Ehret Magnesia Mfg. Co. v. Lungwitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ehret Magnesia Mfg. Co. v. Lungwitz, 237 F. 1017, 150 C.C.A. 665 (3d Cir. 1917).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This writ of error has been argued twice, but we regret to find ourselves still uncertain about the meaning (taken as a whole) of the litigated clauses in this contract, as the case comes before us at a stage when no testimony has been taken. We hope and expect that these difficulties may be removed when the testimony discloses the situation of the parties at the date of the agreement, and that what is now obscure may thus, if possible, be cleared up. Solely for this reason we feel constrained to reverse the judgment, and to direct the District Court to proceed to a trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 F. 1017, 150 C.C.A. 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ehret-magnesia-mfg-co-v-lungwitz-ca3-1917.