Ehrensing v. Thomas

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Ehrensing v. Thomas

1 Gunby 85

DecidedJuly 1, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Gunby 85 (Ehrensing v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ehrensing v. Thomas, 1 Gunby 85 (La. Ct. App. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Clinton, J.

Where interrogatories on facts and articles are not [86]*86required'to be answered in open court, the order need not fix a certain day for answering them.

2. Where interrogatories on facts and articles are not served before day fixed for trial, failure of plaintiff to answer them will not be cause for continuance.

3. A married woman, doing business as a public merchant, may sign a note for goods purchased without authority of her husband.

4. There being no separation of property, the wife and husband are bound in solido for her debts contracted as a public merchant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clinton, J.

Where interrogatories on facts and articles are not [86]*86required'to be answered in open court, the order need not fix a certain day for answering them.

2. Where interrogatories on facts and articles are not served before day fixed for trial, failure of plaintiff to answer them will not be cause for continuance.

3. A married woman, doing business as a public merchant, may sign a note for goods purchased without authority of her husband.

4. There being no separation of property, the wife and husband are bound in solido for her debts contracted as a public merchant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Gunby 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ehrensing-v-thomas-lactapp-1885.