Ehrens v. Press

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ehrens v. Press

487 So. 2d 1140, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 947, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7459

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 22, 1986

DocketNo. 85-1197

StatusPublished

This text of 487 So. 2d 1140 (Ehrens v. Press) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ehrens v. Press, 487 So. 2d 1140, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 947, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7459 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff attempted to hold an attorney responsible as a principal under a contract for the purchase of a condominium unit. The trial court dismissed the breach of contract action at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case and thereafter entered final judgment. We find no error. The contract may have been ambiguous, but the undisputed evidence put on in the plaintiff’s case clearly revealed that everyone knew the purchaser was the defendant’s client, one Yablon, who was a tenant in the unit. Hunt v. Adams, 111 Fla. 164, 149 So. 24 (1933); Van D. Costas, Inc., v. Rosenberg, 432 So.2d 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Panama Realty, Inc., v. Robison, 305 So.2d 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Therefore the judgment under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff attempted to hold an attorney responsible as a principal under a contract for the purchase of a condominium unit. The trial court dismissed the breach of contract action at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case and thereafter entered final judgment. We find no error. The contract may have been ambiguous, but the undisputed evidence put on in the plaintiff’s case clearly revealed that everyone knew the purchaser was the defendant’s client, one Yablon, who was a tenant in the unit. Hunt v. Adams, 111 Fla. 164, 149 So. 24 (1933); Van D. Costas, Inc., v. Rosenberg, 432 So.2d 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Panama Realty, Inc., v. Robison, 305 So.2d 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Therefore the judgment under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

487 So. 2d 1140, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 947, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ehrens-v-press-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack