Ehrenhaus v. Baker
735 S.E.2d 332, 366 N.C. 420, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 1099
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 12, 2012
Docket486P11
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases
This text of 735 S.E.2d 332 (Ehrenhaus v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ehrenhaus v. Baker, 735 S.E.2d 332, 366 N.C. 420, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 1099 (N.C. 2012).
Opinion
1. Objectors’ Pro Se NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA10-1034)
2. Objectors’ Pro Se PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31
3. Defs’ Motion to Dismiss Appeal
4. Pit’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal
L —
2. Denied
3. Allowed
4. Allowed
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Piazza v. Kirkbride
827 S.E.2d 479 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2019)
BDM Invs. v. Lenhil, Inc.
826 S.E.2d 746 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019)
In Re Matter of on George
825 S.E.2d 19 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019)
Ehrenhaus v. Baker
776 S.E.2d 699 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2015)
Wright v. Atl. Orthopedics, P.A.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. v. Clements Walker PLLC
744 S.E.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
735 S.E.2d 332, 366 N.C. 420, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 1099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ehrenhaus-v-baker-nc-2012.