Ehrenhaus v. Baker
735 S.E.2d 332, 366 N.C. 420, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 1099
Opinion
1. Objectors’ Pro Se NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA10-1034)
2. Objectors’ Pro Se PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31
3. Defs’ Motion to Dismiss Appeal
4. Pit’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal
L —
2. Denied
3. Allowed
4. Allowed
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ehrenhaus v. Baker, 735 S.E.2d 332, 366 N.C. 420, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 1099 (N.C. 2012).
735 S.E.2d 332 (Ehrenhaus v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Piazza v. Kirkbride
827 S.E.2d 479 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2019)
BDM Invs. v. Lenhil, Inc.
826 S.E.2d 746 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019)
In Re Matter of on George
825 S.E.2d 19 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019)
Ehrenhaus v. Baker
776 S.E.2d 699 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2015)
Wright v. Atl. Orthopedics, P.A.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. v. Clements Walker PLLC
744 S.E.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)