Ehntholt v. . McCarren
24 N.E. 942, 120 N.Y. 655, 1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1349
Opinion
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ehntholt v. . McCarren, 24 N.E. 942, 120 N.Y. 655, 1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1349 (N.Y. 1890).
24 N.E. 942 (Ehntholt v. . McCarren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Uni-Rty Corp. v. Guangdong Building Inc. (In Re Uni-Rty Corp.)
191 B.R. 595 (S.D. New York, 1996)
In the Matter of 716 Third Avenue Holding Corp., Bankrupt. Jeremiah F. Cross, Trustee-Appellant v. A.G v. Associates, Inc.
340 F.2d 42 (Second Circuit, 1964)
In re 716 Third Avenue Holding Corp.
225 F. Supp. 268 (S.D. New York, 1964)
Kingsley v. Carroll
234 P.2d 1039 (California Court of Appeal, 1951)
Edner v. Mathews
58 F. Supp. 486 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1944)
Converse & Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 742 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)
Reich v. Cochran
102 N.Y.S. 827 (New York Supreme Court, 1907)
Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.
104 N.W. 561 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1905)
Jasper v. Hazen
23 L.R.A. 58 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)