Ehman v. Ail Systems, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ehman v. Ail Systems, Inc.

256 A.D.2d 380, 682 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13420

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D.2d 380 (Ehman v. Ail Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ehman v. Ail Systems, Inc., 256 A.D.2d 380, 682 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13420 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for breach of an alleged employment contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kitson, J.), dated November 10, 1997, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s conclusion that the plaintiff was terminated from his employment with the defendant on July 30, 1990. Therefore, this action for breach of an alleged employment contract, commenced on April 11, 1997, was time-barred (see, CPLR 213). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for breach of an alleged employment contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kitson, J.), dated November 10, 1997, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s conclusion that the plaintiff was terminated from his employment with the defendant on July 30, 1990. Therefore, this action for breach of an alleged employment contract, commenced on April 11, 1997, was time-barred (see, CPLR 213). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 380, 682 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ehman-v-ail-systems-inc-nyappdiv-1998.