Ehlin v. Piccola

14 Misc. 2d 251, 178 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3388
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 7, 1958·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Benjamin Brenner, J.

Motion to strike. case from trial calendar pending completion of an examination before trial is denied on condition that plaintiffs submit to such examination on May 20, 1958; otherwise granted. This motion is made within the requisite 20-day period provided in subdivision (5) of the special readiness rule (of App. Div., 2d Dept.). A lapse of two months after receipt of plaintiffs ’ bill of particulars before a request is made for their examination before trial is not unreasonable, since some time is needed to investigate facts recited in such bill of particulars. This is not to say that defendant may willfully prevent an action being placed on the trial calendar by unreasonably delaying a request for the examination.

Submit order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ehlin v. Piccola, 14 Misc. 2d 251, 178 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3388 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1958).

14 Misc. 2d 251 (Ehlin v. Piccola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

La Porte v. Bertolino
25 Misc. 2d 783 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Crespo v. Peters
20 Misc. 2d 349 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Kerner v. Schulman
14 Misc. 2d 259 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Padula v. City of New York
14 Misc. 2d 259 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Sheehan v. Abbate
14 Misc. 2d 260 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Breitbart v. Gerber
14 Misc. 2d 293 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)