Ehlers v. Hartman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Ehlers v. Hartman

77 N.E. 745, 37 Ind. App. 617, 1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 77

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided April 25, 1906·No. No. 5,874·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellees move to dismiss this appeal for several reasons. We need consider only the first, to wit: August Hartman, Sr., one of the appellees, and who was a defendant in the court below, died December 8, 1904, after judgment was rendered September 14, 1904, and before the transcript was filed in this court September 12, 1905.

This court has no jurisdiction. Ewbank’s Manual, §§145, 229; Hewitt v. Mills (1901), 27 Ind. App. 218; Doble v. Brown (1898), 20 Ind. App. 12.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellees move to dismiss this appeal for several reasons. We need consider only the first, to wit: August Hartman, Sr., one of the appellees, and who was a defendant in the court below, died December 8, 1904, after judgment was rendered September 14, 1904, and before the transcript was filed in this court September 12, 1905.

This court has no jurisdiction. Ewbank’s Manual, §§145, 229; Hewitt v. Mills (1901), 27 Ind. App. 218; Doble v. Brown (1898), 20 Ind. App. 12.

Appeal dismissed.

Ehlers v. Hartman, 77 N.E. 745, 37 Ind. App. 617, 1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 77 (Ind. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

77 N.E. 745 (Ehlers v. Hartman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related