Ehlers v. Hartman

77 N.E. 745, 37 Ind. App. 617, 1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 77
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 25, 1906
DocketNo. 5,874
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 77 N.E. 745 (Ehlers v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ehlers v. Hartman, 77 N.E. 745, 37 Ind. App. 617, 1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 77 (Ind. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellees move to dismiss this appeal for several reasons. We need consider only the first, to wit: August Hartman, Sr., one of the appellees, and who was a defendant in the court below, died December 8, 1904, after judgment was rendered September 14, 1904, and before the transcript was filed in this court September 12, 1905.

This court has no jurisdiction. Ewbank’s Manual, §§145, 229; Hewitt v. Mills (1901), 27 Ind. App. 218; Doble v. Brown (1898), 20 Ind. App. 12.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elliott v. Kern, Rec.
161 N.E. 662 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1928)
Laws v. Hammond, Whiting & East Chicago Railway Co.
128 N.E. 52 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1920)
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Clark
97 N.E. 822 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1912)
Bruiletts Creek Coal Co. v. Pomatto
88 N.E. 606 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 N.E. 745, 37 Ind. App. 617, 1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ehlers-v-hartman-indctapp-1906.