EHCP Capital, LLC v. Siedlund Co.

398 S.W.3d 93, 2013 WL 1803921, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 515
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 30, 2013·No. No. ED 98618·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

EHCP Capital, LLC (EHCP) appeals from the judgment, following a bench trial, finding against EHCP on its claim for enforcement of a promissory note and awarding attorney’s fees and costs to the Siedlund Company. We affirm.1

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EHCP Capital, LLC v. Siedlund Co., 398 S.W.3d 93, 2013 WL 1803921, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 515 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

398 S.W.3d 93 (EHCP Capital, LLC v. Siedlund Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.