E.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

E.H. v. State

869 So. 2d 1231, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3860, 2004 WL 591761

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 2004

DocketNo. 2D03-0444

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 869 So. 2d 1231 (E.H. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E.H. v. State, 869 So. 2d 1231, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3860, 2004 WL 591761 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

FULMER, Judge.

E.H. was found guilty of burglary of a dwelling and grand theft of the third degree. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence for the grand theft charge, arguing that the State failed to prove the value of the stolen property. In D.H. v. State, 864 So.2d 588 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), we recently addressed the same issue in an appeal brought by a codefendant, and we agreed that the testimony was insufficient to meet the State’s burden of proof. Therefore, in accordance with our prior opinion in D.H., we reverse and remand for the trial court to reduce the grand theft to petit theft.

Reversed and remanded.

WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FULMER, Judge.

E.H. was found guilty of burglary of a dwelling and grand theft of the third degree. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence for the grand theft charge, arguing that the State failed to prove the value of the stolen property. In D.H. v. State, 864 So.2d 588 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), we recently addressed the same issue in an appeal brought by a codefendant, and we agreed that the testimony was insufficient to meet the State’s burden of proof. Therefore, in accordance with our prior opinion in D.H., we reverse and remand for the trial court to reduce the grand theft to petit theft.

Reversed and remanded.

WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

869 So. 2d 1231, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3860, 2004 WL 591761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eh-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack