E.H. Development, Inc. v. Kelly Tractor Co.
This text of 501 So. 2d 1301 (E.H. Development, Inc. v. Kelly Tractor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFFIRMED.
ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
We hereby grant appellants’ motion for rehearing and treat it as a motion for clarification.
Appellants have been unable to furnish this court with a transcript of the evidence presented at the final hearing or a reconstructed statement thereof pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(3) which is essential to a proper appellate consideration of the final judgment. Accordingly, we are compelled to affirm the final judgment. Gardner v. Gardner, 501 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).
GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
501 So. 2d 1301, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 381, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eh-development-inc-v-kelly-tractor-co-fladistctapp-1986.