E.H. Development, Inc. v. Kelly Tractor Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

E.H. Development, Inc. v. Kelly Tractor Co.

501 So. 2d 1301, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 381, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10797

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 26, 1986·No. No. 4-86-0985·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

We hereby grant appellants’ motion for rehearing and treat it as a motion for clarification.

Appellants have been unable to furnish this court with a transcript of the evidence presented at the final hearing or a reconstructed statement thereof pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(3) which is essential to a proper appellate consideration of the final judgment. Accordingly, we are compelled to affirm the final judgment. Gardner v. Gardner, 501 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

We hereby grant appellants’ motion for rehearing and treat it as a motion for clarification.

Appellants have been unable to furnish this court with a transcript of the evidence presented at the final hearing or a reconstructed statement thereof pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(3) which is essential to a proper appellate consideration of the final judgment. Accordingly, we are compelled to affirm the final judgment. Gardner v. Gardner, 501 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

E.H. Development, Inc. v. Kelly Tractor Co., 501 So. 2d 1301, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 381, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10797 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

501 So. 2d 1301 (E.H. Development, Inc. v. Kelly Tractor Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related