Egleston v. MaCauley
12 S.C.L. 379
This text of 12 S.C.L. 379 (Egleston v. MaCauley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Egleston v. MaCauley, 12 S.C.L. 379 (S.C. 1821).
Opinion
On a breach of warranty expressed or implied, in the sale of an article, the damages to be recovered must be rateable with the loss ; and if a total loss, the whole sum paid, with interest, may be recovered back. See Deens vs. Neel, (1 Nott & M'Cord, 210.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 S.C.L. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/egleston-v-macauley-sc-1821.